Authorization (AZJ)

AUTHORIZATION
J

Dinis heeft toegang tot informatie over de beveiligingsconfiguratie of heeft toegang tot controlelijsten

How to play?

The key concept is weak authorization controls which may allow unauthorized users to access and manipulate sensitive security configurations, leading to information disclosure and privilege escalation.

Scenario: Dinis’s Unauthorized Access to Security Configurations

Envision a scenario where Dinis, exploiting weak authorization mechanisms, gains access to sensitive security configuration information or access control lists (ACLs). This vulnerability arises from:

  1. Inadequate Protection of Security Settings: Essential security configurations and ACLs are not sufficiently safeguarded against unauthorized access.
  2. Lack of Robust Authorization Checks: The system fails to rigorously verify user permissions for accessing these critical settings.

Example

Dinis discovers that a network management tool in an organization does not adequately restrict access to its security configuration settings and ACLs. Although he is a regular user, the tool’s weak authorization checks allow him to view and potentially alter these configurations. By accessing the ACLs, Dinis manipulates the permissions, granting himself higher access rights and enabling further exploitation of the system.

Threat Modeling

STRIDE

This scenario maps primarily to STRIDE: Information Disclosure and potentially Elevation of Privilege.

Elevation of Privilege (EoP) occurs when an attacker gains access to capabilities or resources beyond their intended permissions. Dinis, a regular user, can access security configurations and ACLs, which are normally restricted and sensitive, meaning that there is a Information Disclosure. In the case that he can modify them, he can grant himself higher privileges, escalating his access. The core issue is unauthorized access to sensitive security controls, potentially, enabling privilege escalation.

What can go wrong?

Such vulnerabilities can lead to unauthorized alterations in security settings, potential system breaches, and the compromise of network integrity.

For more things that can go wrong, see the Common Attack Patterns related to this card in the table below.

What are we going to do about it?

  1. Implement stringent authorization controls to restrict access to security configurations and ACLs, ensuring only authorized personnel can view or modify them.
  2. Regularly audit and monitor access to these settings to detect and respond to any unauthorized attempts.
  3. Employ role-based access control (RBAC) to clearly define and enforce access permissions based on user roles
  4. Restrict access to security-relevant configuration to only appropriate authorized users.

For detailed advice on how to mitigate threats related to the card, see the ASVS and OWASP Developer Guide requirements in the table below.

Mappings

STRIDE: Information Disclosure,Elevation of Privilege

OWASP ASVS: 4.1.2,10.2.3,10.2.4,10.2.5,10.2.6

CAPEC: 1,11,75,116,133,176,179,180,207

OWASP DevGuide: ACM8

OWASP AppSensor: -

SAFECode: 8,10,11

ASVS (4.0.3) Cheat Sheet Series Index

Attacks

Privilege escalation

Insider Threats

OWASP Cornucopia

OWASP Cornucopia is a mechanism in the form of a card game to assist software development teams identify security requirements in Agile, conventional and formal development processes. It is language, platform and technology-agnostic, and is free to use. OWASP Cornucopia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 license, so you can copy, distribute and transmit the work, and you can adapt it, and use it commercially, but all provided that you attribute the work and if you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar licence to this one.

© 2012-2025 OWASP Foundation. The Open Worldwide Application Security Project (OWASP) is a nonprofit foundation that works to improve the security of software.